Description

Methyl-trenbolone

The methyl trenbolone is the most potent steroid ever developed, The Mt1Crin contains a ultra concentrated dosage of methyl trenbolonein in an optimal absorbable injectable version.

Methy-trenbolone is a methyltaed derivative of the already very potent steroid Trenbolone. The addition of the methyl group enables the trenbolone to be orally active (by resisting first deactivation by the liver). How ever the MT1-Crin, which may be used orally, is an ultra potent and a versatile injection version that takes advantage of the unique configuration of its molecule which makes it the most anabolic steroid known to man kind (which goes hand in hand with the strongest androgenic impact know by any steroid)

Here is an interesting and comprehensive review of this unique product by Sciroxx/pharmaca done by the steroids Guru – Mike Arnold – and posted professionalmuscle.com – https://www.professionalmuscle.com/forums/index.php?threads/mike-arnold-high-dose-m-tren-review.147876/page-2

High-Dose Methyltrienelone Cycle and Feedback
?

Everyone is aware that M-Tren is the most potent AAS on the market today, but its toxicity has largely prevented it from entering the steroid limelight. Initially, we were told that this steroid was so toxic that it couldn’t be used at all…and then, when it did hit the market, it was dosed at miniscule quantities of just 250-500 mcg (micrograms, not milligrams) per day. Furthermore, it was normally only used pre-training.

While some claimed to have very good results with this protocol, most reviews were less than impressive.

Over the next few years we began to see higher doses used (on occasion), which were accompanied by much better results.

Based on my experiences over the years, I believe that while M-tren is certainly mote toxic than other methyls, it is NOT so toxic that its use must be limited to 500 mcg-1 mg/day.

Therefore I am going to document my rat’s experience with the following…

M-Tren: 4 mg/day (2 mg in am/ 2 mg in pm)

Duration: 3-4 weeks

In addition to employing a more substantial dose than what we’ve become accustomed to seeing, I believe the 2X daily dosing schedule is important part of this experiment when it comes to determining what this steroid is actually capable of doing. Using a steroid only pre-workout, while helpful, does not in any way provide us with a reliable picture of its true muscle building potential, as such programs only maintain active blood levels of the chosen drug for a small portion of the week–less than 25%, on average. Would one inject test suspension on a schedule that only allowed it to remain active for 1/4 of the week…and then make a judgment call regarding its muscle building potency on such a severely restricted schedule? No one would do that, so I won’t do that here.

Again, there is nothing wrong with pre-training only use, as such programs can end up being ideal for many people depending on their circumstances and goals, but there is no doubt that they are from from ideal when it comes to coaxing maximum gains out of any AAS.

My rat will be using liver support during this cycle, although my suspicion is that a 4 mg daily dose of m-Tren is no more toxic than 20-30 mg of SD per day. Being that such doses of SD are handled relatively easily by the liver, I don’t expect my rat to encounter any issues…although if I find otherwise, I will present my findings to the board.

Up until this point, I can’t recall ANYONE providing this kind of thorough feedback for M-tren, in which blood levels were maintained throughout the week with high doses and for an extended period of time.

I predict that my rat’s liver enzymes will be only moderately elevated at best (maybe slightly above moderate, but not severe) and that it’s gains will range anywhere from good to outstanding. Keep in mind that we all have different goals. Some are more interested in size acquisition, while others will be looking more for sheer strength. Some other will just want to improve their overall appearance.

Therefore, I will provide my opinion on how I believe this steroid performs in all of the commonly noted categories. At the end, I will give my final opinion of this drug…and determine what I think it is best suited for. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, I will compare its effects to other known drugs/combinations of drugs…and ultimately determine if it earns a potential place in the physique-strength world, or if other drugs can provide similar effects with less risk. Will M-Tren used in this way offer unique benefits not found anywhere else, or will it present unacceptable safety risks in exchange for benefits that can be found elsewhere with less risk?

We’ll see.

I am starting tonight….

=============================================================================

I just started Day #4, so there isn’t a lot to report yet, but here’s what I can tell you so far…

Day #1: 1.5 mg/day

Day #2: 1.5 mg/day

Day 3#: 2.5 mg/day.

Today will be the first day at 4 mg/day. I wanted to start out with a lower dosage and see how things went before going up to 4 mg/day. There are two things that stand out in these first few days–one of them physical and the other mental/emotional.

One thing I have noticed is that my rat feels amazing. He has never felt so good–from any AAS–in his life. The effects were near immediate (within 48 hours) and pronounced. Unlike some drugs, which tend to put a fairly large percentage of users on edge and/or cause anxiety (ex. trenbolone), my rat has experienced none of that so far. He just feels good–like really good, with no negative mental or emotional effects at all. It does not seem to affect one’s mental-emotional state like trenbolone does…at least for me.

Remember, just because this drug is trenbolone with a methyl attachment, it does not mean it is just “oral trenbolone”. Way too many people think M-Tren is just trenbolone in oral form. I have even seen some people try to make potency comparisons to regular trenbolone, stating that x amount of M-tren is equal to x amount of trenbolone. All of this is untrue. It doesn’t matter what dose of trenbolone one does or doesn’t take. It will NOT “equal” any dose of trenbolone…because it is not trenbolone. So, the first thing many people need to do is remove this idea from their heads that they can just use trenbolone and receive the same effects…because they can’t.

When a drug is methylated its chemical structure is altered, which makes it a completely different drug with its own unique effect profile. Oftentimes, a methylated compound does not even remotely resemble the parent drug (pre-methylation) in terms of its effects on the mind and body.

Just as much as Dianabol bears no similarity to EQ (even though Dianabol is nothing more than methylated boldenone) and Superdrol bears no similarity to Masteron (even though SD is just methylated Masteron), neither does M-tren provide the same effects as trenbolone. Making statements to the contrary demonstrates gross ignorance regarding the role of methylation and the degree to which small molecular alterations can alter a drug’s effect profile.

Moving on…

One other thing I noticed is that my urine hasn’t yet undergone any significant discoloration. It is common for users of methylated AAS to experiencing darkening of the urine, especially with the more toxic orals, but it can even happen with higher doses of the less toxic orals.

The point here is that with all the toxicity claims surrounding M-Tren, one might expect it to cause significant urine discoloration. Personally, drugs like SD (30 mg/day) will cause my urine to appear almost brown in color if my water intake isn’t kept high enough, but even when it does remain high my urine is still dark orange in color, likely indicating above average liver strain.

Yesterday I researched a dose of 2.5 mg/day and my urine was slightly discolored at best. No brown like SD or even dark orange, which I have experienced numerous times with other orals in the past.

This is not to say that M-Tren doesn’t possess above average toxicity, as I believe it certainly does. However, at this point it doesn’t appear that just 2-3 mg/day is going to do any meaningful harm, especially when used in the short-term. Although urine discoloration isn’t necessarily an accurate indicator of liver stress, it does often serve as a semi-reliable indicator of such, particularly when comparing drugs within the same individual.

Again, I am not saying that 2-3 mg/day is harmless and one should throw caution to the wind. All I am saying is that based on my previous experiences regarding the correlation between urine discoloration and elevated liver values, 2-3 mg of M-Tren per day does not seem to be as demanding on the liver as 30 mg/day if Superdrol.

I am going to go out on a limb here and say that I wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out that it takes roughly 5-8 mg of M-Tren/day to equal 30 mg of SD/day, in terms of hepatic strain. Again, I could be completely wrong, so I don’ advise anyone to try that. It is just speculation based on previous research experiences. Still, I am only 4 days in and just now reached 4 mg/day, so things could change. It is a good sign, though.

Lastly, while my rat normally doesn’t experience appetite suppression with orals after only 4 days (although he has with SD @ 30 mg/day and M1T @ 20 mg/day), he has not experienced any degree of appetite suppression with M-Tren. If anything, my rat is even more hungry than usual and his energy levels and mood are way up. Thus far, it’s overall effects seem to be very conducive to muscle gaining, at least in terms of mood, energy levels and appetite. Let’s see how things go with this recent bump up to 4 mg/day.